Nelson Mandela once said, “If you
talk to a man in a language that he understands, it goes to his head. If you
talk to a man in his language, it goes to his heart.” Language I believe
embodies a historical linguistic evolution that may alter a part of our identity.
Identity more simply stated as what we consider normal checks in the boxes like
age, race, and gender. These identities may then turn into roles and forms of
communication like those between a husband and wife or superior to subordinate.
Linguistics and social constructs on the other hand feel as though language is
meant to be sacred almost, scholarly, proper, precise, English; yet, if most of
our ‘English’ words derive from Latin origins doesn’t that prove that language
is actually quite infinite and diverse?
Social constructs inhibit our
belief that although our language may be altered it doesn’t affect how smart we
are or our ability to understand or do things. “Ya’ll be mad going to the
store” (Lyiscott) this clearly is someone uneducated right? Improperly using
the scholastic language we were taught in school but realistically this is
someone who has used the evolution of language to create their own among an
individual or community or even culture to express themselves. Evolution: the
gradual development of something, especially from a simple to a more complex
form therefore, “let there be no confusion, let be there be no hesitation, this
is not a promotion of ignorance but a linguistic celebration” (Lyiscott)
No comments:
Post a Comment